Isn’t it time pertaining to Additional Higher education Football Bowl Games?

Americans simply cannot get enough of football on television.

Based on a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Even though ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, millions of viewers keep watching, even when oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a casino game that drew just 20,256 fans the other day but attracted an average television audience of 1,114,000, based on ESPN.”

Schrotenboer continues to say, “Only one bowl game this past year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers typically, based on Nielsen. That’s better compared to 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game this past year between the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”

Would you imagine then a following scenario for the college football bowl season:

ESPN builds a unique television studio strictly for the purpose of hosting college bowl games. The tv screen network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In that way, it doesn’t have middleman to cope with for these additional events, eliminating having to negotiate with a different facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway throughout the country.

Since this facility would be built as a tv studio and not being an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN could make attending the bowl game a real multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee in addition to the television viewer to be unlike any other.

But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have only a limited number of seats, say 5,000 or less, which will minimize construction costs. The studio wouldn’t need to be much bigger than the average college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough showing to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be a single bad seat in the house. You’d rest assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate throughout the facility.

Because of the limited supply of seats, this could force ticket demand (and prices) up. No longer 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities which can be less than the usual quarter full. It will be a 180-degree vary from the current experience, where many schools need certainly to rely on daily deal sites to simply help unload their share of allocated tickets.

Thus, the universities would benefit since they wouldn’t be forced to buy the tens of thousands of tickets they cannot sell (even on Groupon).

ESPN could use this facility multiple times during the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.

For instance, in 2010 five additional college football teams qualified for a bowl that these were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating millions of dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers would rather be buying time on a tv program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.

Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also want it – likely to a bowl game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”

Sports

Leave a Reply

Comment
Name*
Mail*
Website*