When examining Microsoft Dynamics, one will notice that it generally does not suffer with these same forms of limitations. It will, however, have its own pair of drawbacks that could be choking your growth.
For those that will not know, Microsoft (MS) Dynamics is similar to Microsoft Office because MS Dynamics is a suite of business application products. In Microsoft Office, there is Word, Excel, Outlook, Powerpoint, Outlook. Each of these programs have a distinct purpose and they interact pretty much together – but it’s not exactly exactly the same picture with MS Dynamics as you will soon see.
Essentially, Microsoft Dynamics is a marketing term for a bunch of business applications offering one CRM and and four (that we shall focus on) ERP systems. Just one, the CRM, was created from the floor up by Microsoft and is web based.
There are primarily four main Microsoft ERP packages which are offered in the United States: GP (previously Great Plains Software), NAV (previously Navision), AX (previously Axapta), and SL (previously Solomon). These four business packages were purchased by Microsoft to be sure they own a foothold in the commercial software space. Each of these systems really are a Windows package (problematic in an increasingly Apple oriented world). Each system is targeted to serve different clients but there is a quite heavy overlap in features and capacities.
Each of these ERP packages have a long and solid history. But there are some limitations when comparing to Cloud apps such as for example NetSuite. First and foremost, you have to get equipment, server software, and labor to setup, maintain and manage the system. Dynamics GP Cloud All this requires business expenditure – and this really is where you could see your growth inhibited. All the amount of money spent managing these processes, could be definitely better used to develop your business.
Another weakness with your independent packages is that each of them have their own reporting capacities. Integrated reporting creates easier business planning. In Microsoft Dynamics, you should write your own personal reports to combine the data stored within the independent ERP and CRM systems. And Microsoft offers yet another product to get to important computer data, the Management Reporter. Overall, you won’t get the most effective business intelligence because the information is stored in multiple locations. This really is among the strengths of fully integrated business management software, such as for example NetSuite.
Microsoft has created its own Cloud offering. It is known as Azure, which is a solution to host these business apps to operate in the Cloud. This can eliminate the requirement for hardware and server software. But there are still challenges, including the need to determine and create an Azure environment and make certain it functions properly. Meaning you still better have an IT geek nearby to simply help out. Naturally, there are third parties which are readily available for hosting and set up. But most of these processes have costs associated together that can be avoided with the right architecture and offer; essentially, this approach means you are outsourcing a section of your IT; although not nearly enough of it. For some businesses, there is little competitive value in managing all that software in the cloud.
Your costs will undoubtedly be higher as the architecture of Dynamics is not multi-tenent. It had been meant to be its own unique instance. A huge drawback is that you should manually perform your own personal upgrades – and if that you do not, you’ll get behind and possibly risk the need to execute a new implementation; like setting up new software. The benefit of software systems, such as for example NetSuite, is that the software is upgraded twice per year, is within the contract, and you can’t get behind.